环保技术落后10年 治污先导研发储备制度亟待建立
45 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
12
votes
0
answers
1k
views
What is arXiv++, and who is behind it?
I have just learned of the existence of arXiv++ via an email, whose main content was:
The summary of your paper "Critical spin chains and loop models with $U(n)$ symmetry" has just received ...
- 2,574
5
votes
0
answers
178
views
Potential Plagiarism by a reviewer (that we recommended to PC chair)
I recently submitted a paper to a conference and received four positive reviews and one negative review. The negative reviewer did not want any discussion on the paper, so we contacted the program ...
- 171
4
votes
0
answers
346
views
Awaiting recommendation, but before any sort of peer review
I submitted a paper through ScholarOne Manuscripts 3 days ago. The first status that I am getting is "ADM: Awaiting Recommendation" , just after the initial status which was "ADM: ...
- 278
4
votes
0
answers
121
views
Are there guidelines that say if post-submission publications must be cited?
I can see from this question Can I cite a paper published after the initial submission of my paper? asking if it is okay to cite papers after submission is answered as, yes- and sometimes you need to.
...
- 407
4
votes
0
answers
168
views
To what extent are reviewers influenced by other reviews?
Is there any research/study/survey/... that looked at to what extent reviewers are influenced by other reviews?
For example, ICLR 2019 published reviews publicly before all reviewers had written the ...
4
votes
1
answer
101
views
What is a “proper systematic order listing”?
I have a paper under review at a journal, and in it I have included a table of all of the species which exhibit a particular behaviour. Species are grouped by Order, and then family, and then species. ...
- 14.3k
3
votes
0
answers
90
views
OJS Implementation Concerns for University Journal
As an editor of a university journal, I'm considering OJS to improve transparency and streamline our manual submission/review process. Before proposing this to our IT team (who aren't very technical), ...
- 547
3
votes
1
answer
351
views
When bidding for papers on softconf.com as a reviewer, does it make any difference between answering no or not bidding for a paper?
When bidding for papers on softconf.com as a reviewer, does it make any difference between answering no or not answering for a paper?
I.e., is there difference between:
and
?
Answering some comments:...
CommunityBot
- 1
2
votes
0
answers
267
views
Refereeing for American Journal Experts
I was asked via mail (which looks borderline suspicious) to referee a paper for the American Journal Experts AJE, who claim to coordinate the refereeing for a Hindawi journal dedicated to applied ...
- 129
2
votes
0
answers
216
views
How to mark paper as mainly my work before moving institutions
I have a paper that has some important work. I recently graduated and am about to work at a top 5 tech firm's AI research division. As part of the interview, they seemed really excited about this work ...
- 51
2
votes
0
answers
179
views
There is an uncommon icon for my submission on EasyChair
I have submitted a manuscript via EasyChair. I assume that
iIt is still under review because I had no notifications of any sort.
When I click on my role on the main page, there is a link which allows ...
- 12.3k
2
votes
0
answers
869
views
Inderscience peer-Review Process
I submitted my paper two months ago to an Inderscience journal. Well, this is my first experience with Inderscience publisher, so while checking my paper updates, I can not understand the meaning of “...
- 121
2
votes
0
answers
96
views
How can the reader verify the validity of the claims in a published clinical trial paper?
I am from the field of Mathematics. If you find some published articles in a mathematical journal, you can check the validity of the claimed results just by reading the proof or provide a ...
- 4,186
2
votes
0
answers
87
views
Choosing a journal to offer services for review
I'm a Master's level statistician working in academics research, public health policy, and so on. The area itself is marginally interesting to me. I'm interested in professional development, but my ...
- 667
2
votes
0
answers
340
views
Contacting editor-in-chief regarding delay ?
I have a paper in review in a prestigious applied math journal. The average time from first submission to final decision in that journal is about 8 months.
The first round of reviews took 7 months. ...
CommunityBot
- 1